The study, by US scientists, has calculated the rate of global mean sea level rise is not just going up at a steady rate of 3mm a year, but has been increasing by an additional 0.08mm a year, every year since 1993.
If the rate of change continues at this pace, global mean sea levels will rise 61 centimetres between now and 2100, they report today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"That's basically double the amount you would get if you only had 3 mm a year with no acceleration," said the study's lead author Steven Nerem of the University of Colorado.
But that figure, which is broadly in line with climate modelling, is likely to be a conservative estimate of global mean sea level rise in the future, said Professor Nerem.
"When you try to extrapolate numbers like this you're assuming sea level change and acceleration are going to be the same as they've been over the past 25 years.
"But that's probably not going to be the case.
"We're seeing changes in Greenland and Antarctica that are almost certainly going to be bigger than that in the future," he said.
Putting a number on sea level rise
Global warming drives sea level rises in two ways: by melting land-based ice sheets, and heating up ocean water causing it to expand.
Sea levels have been recorded by a series of four satellites, starting with the 1992 launch of the TOPEX/Poseidon satellite, in addition to long-term data captured by tidal gauges.
Professor Nerem said analysis of tidal gauge records and decadal changes in satellite data in the past had indicated global mean sea level rise was accelerating, but it had been hard to pin down a number.
"We always felt that there was an acceleration, but it's very small and it's difficult to detect," he said.
To arrive at their number, Professor Nerem and colleagues adjusted the satellite data for short-term factors such as the El Niño/La Niña climate patterns, as well as the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, which caused sea levels to drop just before the launch of the TOPEX satellite.
They also cross-referenced tide gauge and satellite data to correct anomalies in the TOPEX satellite record proposed in an earlier research co-authored by John Church of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales (UNSW).
"This is the first satellite-based estimate of an acceleration number," Professor Nerem said.
"The number is useful because you can take the rate of sea level change and the acceleration, and extrapolate it in the future and see how it agrees with climate models."
The figure calculated by Professor Nerem's study is similar to those predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Charge (IPCC) under its upper 8.5 scenario, which assumes increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
UNSW's Professor Church is the co-convening lead author of chapters on sea level rise in the most recent IPCC assessment report.
He said the length of the new study and the correction of the satellite data was important.
"This is very solid confirmation … there is an acceleration and it's the right magnitude to be consistent with IPCC, Professor Church said.
Ice sheet melting is a real concern
Professor Nerem's team also looked at data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite, which monitored changes in Earth's gravitational field, to determine where the figure was coming from.
They found the bulk of the acceleration was caused by the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, which contributed 0.02mm and 0.03mm a year, every year, to the overall acceleration rate.
Professor Church said the Antarctic was contributing more to acceleration than previous estimates.
"Ice sheets have huge amounts of equivalent sea level stored in them," Professor Church said.
"I think that's a real concern. The ice sheets are contributing measurably to this acceleration," he said.
Professor Nerem said the next step was to continue looking at the satellite data to get a longer-term picture.
"This was a first detection in the satellite altimeter record, so we just barely have enough time series to feel comfortable publishing an estimate of acceleration," Professor Nerem said.
"In addition, we'll certainly be watching our data to see if there are any rapid changes in the ice sheets that might be detected."
One of the important tools that will enable them to do that will be the launch of a new GRACE satellite in April.
"That allows us to directly observe the ice sheets," he said.